Seena vs Maze
Maze is built for structured, pre-launch testing with recruited participants. Seena tests prototypes too, and then keeps going after you ship.
If you only read one part, read this.
What Maze is genuinely good at.
Maze has a mature, dedicated prototype-testing toolkit built for exactly this job, plus an on-demand panel of over five million for reaching audiences you do not have yet. If your team runs structured pre-launch studies with recruited participants, Maze's tooling goes deeper than ours does — card sorting and tree testing in particular are things we do not attempt.
Different jobs, not better and worse.
Not just pre-launch
Seena tests prototypes too — anything running on the web, including Figma Make prototypes — and then keeps watching after you ship, continuously, in production. The test does not end at launch, which is where most of the real behavior starts.
Recruited versus real
Maze's participants agreed to evaluate something. Seena's are trying to accomplish a goal with real stakes. Someone evaluating a flow and someone depending on it behave differently.
Study versus standing
A Maze study is designed, launched and read. Seena is simply on, so the question you think of on Thursday has often already been answered.
What it takes to run
Maze studies need designing and launching. Seena needs one line of code.
What each one costs.
Competitor pricing last checked August 2026. Prices change — check theirs before deciding.
Can you use both?
Yes. Maze for panel-recruited pre-launch studies, Seena for prototype testing on your own traffic and everything after launch.
Who should pick what.
If you need to reach an audience you do not have, or you rely on card sorting and tree testing, Maze. If you are testing with people who already use your product — before launch on a prototype, or after it in production — Seena covers both ends without a separate study each time.
See it on your own traffic.
Add one line of code and hear from your real users today. Free to start, and the price is on the page.